just double checking...

[bail3yz]

if I predicted

Franklin, Decision, Split Decision

and franklin won by unanimous decision.. that would be 16 points correct?

and if franklin won by KO in round 3.. it would be 10 points?

[vikingpride]

I think it's only 10. On decisions i believe it's impossible to score 16 and you score either 10 or perfect. I asked about something similar awhile ago and i believe thats the answer i got.

Edit: Yep here is my question and Pearce's answer in another thread.

So when a fight goes to decision you either are gonna score 10 or 32 pts(with no other possible option). Or If you pick the right person, but wrong kind of decision (like Split when it's unanimous) do you still get 6 to get a total of 16pts for the fight?

I'm assuming it's the first way, but i think the second way makes sense that way even fights that go to decision match up scoring wise with other fights that don't.


Ok, yes it will work that in the event of a decision you will score either 10 or 32. I've made it like this because a few people were contantly picking a 3rd round decision as a means of scoring an easy 32 points.

Hopefully the need to specify in the case of a decision will call for a bit more skill from the players .

[bail3yz]

I think it would make more sense to have
the round options be (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Decision)
and have the method options be (TKO/KO, Sub, Split Decision, UD, etc)

that way you can still get 16 points if you pick decision but get the type of decision wrong

---------- Post added at 04:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:09 PM ----------

wait.. shit.. apparently i already whined about this.. i think he changed it and the posts you posted are old

[Jack]

I think it would make more sense to have
the round options be (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Decision)
and have the method options be (TKO/KO, Sub, Split Decision, UD, etc)

that way you can still get 16 points if you pick decision but get the type of decision wrong

Yeah I agree with this, that's what I thought it would be as well.

[bail3yz]

I am just going to assume its the way I suggested.. because I think pearce did change it.. but not 100% sure

[vikingpride]

I think it would make more sense to have
the round options be (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Decision)
and have the method options be (TKO/KO, Sub, Split Decision, UD, etc)

that way you can still get 16 points if you pick decision but get the type of decision wrong

---------- Post added at 04:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:09 PM ----------

wait.. shit.. apparently i already whined about this.. i think he changed it and the posts you posted are old

Yeah i agree, even said so in my question to pearce. It just makes all the fights similar in value. O btw here was your response in that thread to Pearce's answer
Fuck
lol

Edit: yep your right Bail3yz, i didn't go far enough into that thread.

[bail3yz]

lol, ya but after that I made some suggestions and he said something about changes lol

[vikingpride]

Yeah i edited my last post, after reading a bit further into the thread. This way makes much more sense, like i originally said in that thread.

Btw i sent my picks in a few days back, but just put UD or split-decision. I would assume that thats clear enough, right?

[bail3yz]

I would think so lol
Unless you predict a round 1 UD

[vikingpride]

I would think so lol
Unless you predict a round 1 UD

Damn, will have to edit my picks. lol